SUMMARY REPORT ABOUT THE MEETING IN THE PARLIAMENT
DEMOCRACY IN SEVERE CRISIS
Summary report of the meeting with Mr. Andrew Reed, assistant to Mr. Nigel Farage, MEP, from UKIP ( United Kingdom Independence Party and Democracy) on July 8th, 2008 in the Europarliament Low Building in Strasbourg, France, from 1.45 p.m to 3.10 p.m.
Our chat with Mr Andrew Reed could be summed up with the above title. Unfortunately, the delegation of the Strasbourg demonstration could not speak to Mr. Nigel Farage, MEP, personally but he came by for a short while, just to greet us. Mr. Andrew Reed not only confirmed the title of this article, but he was also critical of the EU policy, which is not quite close to the citizens, in general. He explained the mechanisms of political power and their influences on democracy. He gave us an outline of the abuse of power which is easily possible in a democracy and is more and more widespread. This, of course, is very alarming.
The abuse of power is the essence of moral evil. Moral evil occurs, when the authorities refuse to accept the responsibility for the welfare of those who are logically under their care. When there is no close relation with the citizens, moral evil and tort are common practice. The abuse of power is the telltale sign of democracies in crisis. We are governed by a distant political elite,which has lost all contact with the people. Nobody than we, the victims of mindcontrol and electronic harassment , could have agreed more. While Mr. Andrew Reed tried to make us understand his position and his problems, we tried to get a word in and present our own problems. He asked about the whys and wherefores of this control of the psyche, when it had occured and how it had impacted on us. We gave him a few examples and an update of psychophysical means and weapons, and of the existing laws on their misuse. He took down notes of all this. In my opinion , he was very well aware of all these means and weapons, and even of the laws, but he did not show how much aware he was. He also seemed to let us understand he has very scarce knowledge of the HAARP issue and the EU-Resolution A4-0005/99, although the UK is one of the most important states, which have participated in the similar EISCAT installations in Norway.
Neither did he make comments on our allegations that England used mindcontrol technology in the Northern Ireland Conflict and on the island itself, e.g.in Greenham Commons in 1988. We talked about the development and the proliferation of Non-lethal Weapons and the international symposia in Ettlingen, Germany. When we asked him about a possible specific reaction of the EU-Parliament to the problems under discussion, (e.g. in the form of a specific EU-resolution), he could not promise us that he would be able to organize and form a subcommittee for this purpose, nor even a subcommittee for the investigation of our allegations and complaints.
The assenting votes of quite a few delegates would be needed and the party's fraction in the EU-Parliament would just be a bit too small. Whether this statement was 100% true, I doubt a bit, as the overall number of the so-called “eurosceptics” fraction amounts to 37 ,to the best of my knowledge.
In other words, a specific EU-Resolution regarding mindcontrol means and electronic harassment weapons is not yet in sight. Apparently, there is some “understanding” of our complaints, but in the end nobody is willing to really do something about it.
The question we have to ask ourselves is what will everything be like, if we ask the politicians and the governments to forbid and stop the use of the weapons in question on humans.They are, right now, lining their greedy pockets with a quick profit, they are, right now, making their dictatorial dreams come true . So who wants to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs?
At the end of the meeting, we handed out information material to Mr. Andrew Reed ( books of Jim Keith and Heiner Gehring and additional info-material, the Smirnov-DVD ). It remains to be seen whether or not Mr. Reed will have a look at them . When we pointed out that the fate and the whole future of our children are at stake, Mr Reed agreed and was quite impressed.
Comment: At least, the European Parliament has now been informed by a first hand source. Now, they know that there exist citizens who want to fight for the issue and for their most fundamental Human Rights. This issue and that of getting the delegates support our cause should now be our most important goal.